People For the American Way

Abortion Ban Puts Health and Rights at Risk

People For in Action
Abortion Ban Puts Health and Rights at Risk

The U.S. Senate is expected to vote January 29 on whether to take up an unconstitutional and dangerous abortion ban that puts individuals’ health and rights at risk. The GOP and their right-wing allies want to rush this bill to President Trump’s desk and deliver a big anti-choice win on the heels of Trump’s March for Life speech. With the House having passed its bill back in October, they are just steps away from doing so. And they won’t stop there. The anti-choice movement is using abortion bans in their decades-long quest to overturn Roe v. Wade entirely. People For the American Way is among nearly forty organizations, led by the National Women’s Law Center, urging the Senate to reject this latest attempt and instead focus on efforts to expand access to comprehensive health care. You can download our January 25 letter, with footnotes, here.

Dear Senators:

We write to you as organizations strongly opposed to S. 2311, an unconstitutional and dangerous abortion ban that puts individuals’ health and rights at risk. Politicians opposed to abortion hope to use S. 2311 to make it difficult—if not impossible—for individuals to access their constitutionally protected right. The bill is expected on the Senate floor next week and, if enacted, would impose a nationwide ban on abortions at an arbitrary cutoff point with only two inadequate and extremely narrow exceptions. There are many reasons why someone may need an abortion and—as with any medical care—there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution. Because each situation is different, we should not deny a person the ability to make a decision in consultation with those they trust the most. The very purpose of this federal abortion ban is to deny women this dignity and right.

This bill is unconstitutional. It is a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade, which held that states may not ban abortion prior to fetal viability and that post-viability bans must include adequate protections for both a woman’s life and health. S. 2311 clearly violates these established constitutional standards by banning pre-viability abortions outright,1 including an inadequate life exception, and failing entirely to include a health exception.

This nationwide abortion ban interferes with and obstructs the provider-patient relationship, by criminalizing the delivery of critically-needed and constitutionally protected care, imprisoning health care providers for up to five years just for providing abortions to patients. The bill also mandates an “informed consent” form that conflicts with established medical practice and recognized processes for ensuring true informed consent. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the nation’s leading association of medical experts on women’s health, has come out in strong opposition to abortion bans of this kind, citing the serious threat these laws pose to women’s health and because such bans are not based on sound science. A patient’s health, not politics, should drive important medical decisions. Patients do not look to politicians for advice on mammograms, cervical cancer screenings, or maternal health needs, and abortion is no different. This deeply personal decision should always be made by the patient in consultation with those they trust, not politicians.

The federal abortion ban shows an appalling lack of concern or understanding of the reality of people’s lives. For example, S. 2311 will particularly harm people already facing multiple barriers to care, particularly Black, Latinx, and Native people. Black and Latina women are more likely to experience unintended pregnancy, due to racial, ethnic, gender, and economic healthcare inequalities. Moreover, Black, Latina, and Native women are overrepresented in low-wage jobs and are substantially more likely to live below the federal poverty line as compared to white women.2 For those working in low-wage jobs and struggling to make ends meet, delays associated with scheduling and saving up the funds to cover the direct and indirect costs of an abortion—such as child care, time off work, transportation expenses, and hotel costs—can push their procedure later in pregnancy. S. 2311’s arbitrary cutoff can leave many of these people unable to access the care they need.

The extremely narrow exceptions in this bill also illustrate the sponsors’ appalling lack of compassion for—or trust in—the individuals who would be affected by this ban. For example, the bill imposes strict requirements on sexual assault survivors seeking abortion care after a rape. The bill forces adult rape survivors either to report the crime or to seek medical care or counseling at least 48 hours prior to getting an abortion. To comply with this requirement, a rape survivor would need at least two appointments with two different providers in order to get an abortion. Depending on the availability of medical care in the area where the survivor lives, it may be difficult or even impossible to comply.

The bill also contains reporting requirement for rape survivors who are minors and for incest survivors. This places an unfair burden on minors who need time-sensitive and safe care, not additional reporting and documentation requirements that can become barriers in accessing the care they need. Moreover, the bill also requires that rape and incest survivors provide documentation that they met the medical or counseling care or reporting requirements before they can get an abortion.

The federal abortion ban is a blatant attempt to deny women their constitutional rights and threaten the health of people in the United States. The Senate should reject S. 2311 and instead focus on efforts to expand access to comprehensive health care.

Sincerely,

American Association of University Women (AAUW)
American Civil Liberties Union
Association of Reproductive Health Professionals
Black Women’s Health Imperative
Catholics for Choice
Center for Reproductive Rights
Constitutional Accountability Center
Feminist Majority
Hadassah, The Women’s Zionist Organization of America, Inc.
Ibis Reproductive Health
In Our Own Voice: National Black Women’s Reproductive Justice Agenda
Jewish Women International
NARAL Pro-Choice America
National Abortion Federation
National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum (NAPAWF)
National Center for Lesbian Rights
National Council of Jewish Women
National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association
National Health Law Program
National Institute for Reproductive Health
National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health
National LGBTQ Task Force Action Fund
National Network of Abortion Funds
National Organization for Women
National Partnership for Women & Families
National Women’s Health Network
National Women’s Law Center
People For the American Way
Physicians for Reproductive Health
Planned Parenthood Federation of America
Population Connection Action Fund
Population Institute
Secular Coalition for America
Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States
Union for Reform Judaism
URGE: Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity
Voices for Progress

Tags:

Abortion, Countering Attacks on Women's Equality, reproductive rights, Roe v. Wade