Fair and Just Courts

Federal Judge Terrence Boyle Unfit for Promotion to Appeals Court

Federal law prohibiting employment discrimination

Ellis v. North Carolina

Federal Judge Terrence Boyle Unfit for Promotion to Appeals Court

Record as a Judge Shows High Reversal Rate, Troubling Rulings on Individual Rights

A People For the American Way Analysis of Boyle’s Judicial Record

Carolyn Kuhl's Misleading Testimony Concerning the Sanchez-Scott Case

Much of the questioning of Ninth Circuit nominee Carolyn Kuhl at her April 1, 2003 confirmation hearing focused on her disturbing ruling dismissing invasion of privacy claims in the case of Azucena Sanchez-Scott, a breast cancer survivor. As demonstrated below, Kuhl’s testimony about this case not only failed to address Senators’ concerns about her ruling but was grossly misleading.

Senators’ concerns

Carolyn Kuhl’s Hearing Strengthened the Case Against Her Confirmation


Even before the April 1, 2003 hearing on Carolyn Kuhl’s nomination by President Bush to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, significant opposition to Kuhl’s confirmation had arisen because of her troubling record as a lawyer and judge. Throughout her career — as a lawyer in the Reagan Administration Justice Department, in private practice, and as a state judge — Kuhl has followed a legal philosophy harmful to the rights and interests of ordinary Americans.

Share this page: Facebook Twitter Digg SU Digg Delicious