Fischer: Two Percent Of Gay Soldiers Are Responsible For Thousands Of Sexual Assaults Per Year

Today, the American Psychological Association released a series of papers reporting that "rates of military sexual trauma among men who served in the military may be as much as 15 times higher than has been previously reported, largely because of barriers associated with stigma, beliefs in myths about male rape, and feelings of helplessness."

Predictably, this has been seized upon by Bryan Fischer as proof that the small percentage of gay men in the military are responsible for tens of thousands of sexual assaults every year.

Ignoring clear statement from the reports themselves that it is a myth to claim "that male rape is homosexual sex and therefore, that only homosexual men get raped and only homosexual men perpetrate rape," Fischer insisted on his radio program today that gay men are committing these thousands of sexual assaults because they are inherently violent.

"One of the pathologies that is associated with the homosexual lifestyle is violence and sexual assault," he said. "It's a characteristic of sexual activity in that community."

Asserting that 14,000 men and 12,000 women the military were sexually assaulted in 2013, Fischer proclaimed that "despite the fact that homosexuals comprise just a tiny sliver of our population, maybe two per cent of the population," those "two per cent of the males in the military are responsible for more sexual assaults of males than all of the heterosexual men in the military."

Rafael Cruz: If Hillary Clinton Wins, 'This Country Will Be Destroyed'

In a speech last month, Rafael Cruz repeated his claim that America will be no more if Hillary Clinton becomes president.

Cruz told an audience in Minnesota that they should support his son, Sen. Ted Cruz, in his effort to “take this country back” because “we don’t have any more time.”

If his son fails to win the GOP presidential nomination, he warned, a “mushy, middle-of-the-road, stand-for-nothing moderate like Jeb Bush” will come out on top, “and if Jeb Bush gets the nomination, Hillary will be our next president and this country will be destroyed.”

Marco Rubio Picks Anti-Gay Birther To Chair Alabama Campaign

Marco Rubio’s presidential campaign announced last week that its operation in Alabama would be chaired by state Rep. Will Ainsworth and former state Republican Party chairman Bill Armistead, according to

The choice of Armistead and Ainsworth is slightly surprising from a candidate who is trying to position himself in contrast to some of his more far-right competitors in the GOP race.

We first encountered Armistead in the lead-up to the 2012 election, when he urged an audience to watch the insane birther film “Dreams From My Real Father,” which posits that President Obama has been hiding the fact that his real father was labor activist Frank Marshall Davis, who groomed him from birth to stage a communist takeover of America. “This is absolutely frightening,” Armistead told the audience. “I’ve seen it. I verified that it is factual, all of it. People can determine.”

Armistead is also apparently a fan of the work of another anti-Obama conspiracy theorist, Wayne Allyn Root, once distributing to the state party’s email list a column by Root alleging that the president is a clinically diagnosable sociopath.

Armistead is not a fan of LGBT rights, either, writing on the state party’s website earlier this year that Alabama risked inviting "God’s wrath" if it accepted marriage equality:

So, how is it that God’s truth can be turned on its head as the debate now rages in Alabama regarding the meaning of marriage? The answer is that we, as a society, have become our own god. We have made God in our image. But, God will not be mocked. The State of Alabama and the United States of America will reap God’s wrath if we embrace and condone things that are abhorrent to God, such as redefining marriage as anything other than a union between one man and one woman.

Ainsworth, the Rubio campaign’s other Alabama co-chair, takes a similar view of marriage equality. In February, he urged a probate judge in his district to defy a lower federal court ruling requiring the state to issue marriage licenses to gay couples, saying that officials should follow “God’s law, not the unconstitutional and immoral law being manufactured by liberal activists”:

"The probate judge in Marshall County, who is a Democrat, must not capitulate to the ungodly and immoral attacks on traditional marriage," he continued. "If I were in his shoes, I would stand strong and hold my ground in defense of God's law, not the unconstitutional and immoral law being manufactured by liberal activists."

"Marriage can exist only between a man and a woman because it is an institution created and ordained by God, and it is the analogy he used for salvation," Ainsworth said. "Every society that has allowed the marriage covenant to be destroyed has withered away and vanished. I do not believe we should hate homosexuals because every person should be treated with love and respect, but something that is immoral does not become moral simply because an activist judge decided it is legal."

Ainsworth commented on many new writer and politicians saying Alabama needs to avoid "being on the wrong side of history" in trying to prevent gay marriage.

"If the choice is between being on the wrong side of a distorted, immoral, liberal perception of history, or violating God's laws, teachings, and biblical admonitions, I will happily disappoint the liberals every time," Ainsworth said. "During the campaign, my signs carried the slogan 'Fight Obama,' and, make no mistake, the gay rights agenda is the bedrock of Obama's agenda. I will use the upcoming session to look for every legislative remedy and tool that can be used to protect our traditional, conservative Alabama values, and I will continue the fight even after others have surrendered."

After the Supreme Court struck down same-sex marriage bans nationwide, Ainsworth said, “God has told us that marriage exists only between a man and a woman, and His ruling supersedes any ruling by nine appointed judges.”

Pat Robertson: Transgender Girl Just Wants To Peep In Locker Room

Last year, Pat Robertson pushed back against “the misconception that I’m sort of right-wing extremist,” in part by citing his belief that he sees “nothing wrong” with transgender people seeking sex reassignment surgery.

The televangelist’s “progressive” views on transgender issues didn’t last long, shockingly enough, and today he lambasted the Obama administration after the Education Department found that “an Illinois school district violated anti-discrimination laws when it did not allow a transgender student who identifies as a girl and participates on a girls’ sports team to change and shower in the girls’ locker room without restrictions.”

Robertson suggested that the transgender student may just want to stare at naked girls: “This transgender stuff, I mean, this was a boy and this boy, we don’t know what surgery was performed on him, if any, we don’t know what his parts are, and yet he wants to go into the girls’ locker room and see all these disrobed little girls running around.”

“They don’t want some little boy in their locker room,” he continued. “He says, ‘I’m not a little boy, I’m a little girl.’ Whoever heard of such nonsense in a great nation like the United States of America? Why are we doing this? And the federal government is doing everything it can to push this agenda.”

Kevin Swanson Aghast That Christians Support 'Death Penalty Crime' Of Gay Marriage

This weekend, three Republican presidential candidates are slated to appear at a conference in Iowa hosted by homeschooling activist and conservative radio host Kevin Swanson, who, as we have previously reported, has a variety of radical views ranging from defending the death penalty for homosexuality to thinking that Girl Scout cookies and the movie “Frozen” turn girls into lesbians to having a troubling grasp on the science of birth control.

In preparation for this weekend’s event, we’ve been going back to the archives of Swanson’s “Generations Radio” program, which include a 2013 program in which he responded to a Christian listener who objected to his anti-gay rants by calling gay marriage “a death penalty crime from the word of God” and agreeing with his cohost’s assessment that the Bible allows two men to marry if “at the ceremony, you stone them.”

In the May, 2013, program, Swanson read from a letter from a pro-gay-rights Christian listener, calling the letter “outrageous,” “perverted” and “as bad as it gets” and comparing the letter-writer to the Pharisees.

“He’s in support of a death penalty crime from the word of God, he’s in support of homosexual marriage,” Swanson said. “Amazing.”

Swanson lamented that so few Christians were willing to stand up for the Old Testament prohibitions on homosexuality and object to other sins plaguing the nation “because it takes courage and it takes faith to talk to the sick body of our dying carcass of a nation.”

Swanson’s cohost, Dave Buehner, also thought it was amusing that the letter-writer had said that the Bible doesn’t forbid gay marriage, saying, “nowhere does it forbid marrying a giraffe” either.

“Let’s grant him his point,” Buehner said. “A man can marry a man or a man can marry a giraffe and then at the ceremony, you stone them.”

“Okay, all right,” Swanson replied. “So he’s right. This is how bad it gets, my friends.”

Louie Gohmert Suggests A Congressional Study Putting Gay And Straight Couples On An Island To 'See Which One Nature Favors'

Last week, Rep. Louie Gohmert delivered the convocation at Liberty University, where he repeated his call for a study in which straight couples and gay and lesbian couples are placed on separate deserted islands in order to prove that homosexuality is unnatural.

Gohmert was complaining about the Supreme Court's marriage equality decision and was attempting to make the case that even people who don't believe in God ought to be able to see that same-sex relationships are not natural.

"Let's just take a totally secular approach to this," he said. "Congress is good about having studies; how about if we take four heterosexual couples and put them on an island where they have everything they need to live and exist and we take four couples of just men and put them on an island where they have all they need to survive and then let's take four couples of just women and put them on an island and then lets come back in 100 years and see which one nature favors."

Pat Robertson: Gay Marriage Will Legalize Pedophilia

Only Pat Robertson could manage to transform a question about why bad things happen to children into a rant about gay marriage, and the right-wing televangelist managed to do just that today on “The 700 Club.”

When a viewer wrote in to ask why God would allow tragedies like child abuse to occur, Robertson responded by whipping up fears that the Supreme Court’s marriage equality decision will pave the way for the legalization of pedophilia.

“The time is going to come in America, the Supreme Court said homosexuality is a constitutional right, now they’ve said homosexual marriage is a right, then they’re going to say polygamy is a constitutional right, then they’re going to say polyamory is a constitutional right, then they’re going to say pedophile [sic] is a constitutional right,” he said. “You mark my word. They’re talking about transgender and sex change and all of this stuff. We have lost our mind, collectively, and it’s going to get worse and worse and worse and worse. Trust me.”

He went on to say that “sex with little babies” is widely encouraged in Islam: “There is no such thing as pedophilia in that religion.”

Rafael Cruz: 'Praise God There Are 300 Million Guns In America'

In a speech in Minnesota last month, Ted Cruz’s father and campaign surrogate Rafael Cruz declared that President Obama is on the cusp of confiscating people’s guns, which is why it’s a good thing Americans own so many firearms.

The elder Cruz managed to turn the subject to guns after he fielded a question about whether the federal government should crack down on states like Colorado that have legalized marijuana. Cruz said that the federal government must enforce its drug laws in such situations because, as he explained, the people of Colorado want them to, even though a referendum legalizing marijuana passed with 55 percent of the vote.

This led him to rail against President Obama for considering executive actions on gun law reform, which he cited as another case of the administration flouting the law.

“He’s talking about doing an executive order to put gun control because he can push gun control,” he said. “Let me tell you something about gun control. Look at history. Every king or dictator that has taken the guns away from the population then use it against the population. But praise God there are 300 million guns in America in the hands of private citizens and I don’t know a single one that is willing to give those guns back to the government.”

Cruz went on to allege that “the violence and the racial strife that we are seeing” has been “fueled by this administration,” claiming that the demonstrators in Ferguson, Missouri, were flown in from across the country.

“This administration wants to create strife,” he said. “The whole concept of social justice is all about dividing everybody into a series of smaller groups, make every group seem like a victim and put one group against the other. They are trying to create this strife.”

He said that the president is doing this because he is following Saul Alinsky’s book “Rules for Radicals,” warning that Hillary Clinton will similarly implement this Alinskyite plot. The solution, he said, is to “stop this concept of hyphenated Americans and get back to ‘we’re all Americans.’”

Sheriff David Clarke: 'Blacks Sell Drugs' Because They Are 'Lazy' And 'Morally Bankrupt'

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, an outspoken critic of President Obama, Black Lives Matter, and LGBT rights, hosts a weekly podcast, “The People’s Sheriff,” on Glenn Beck’s TheBlaze Radio Network. Clarke spent last week’s podcast analyzing a New York Times piece by Harvard professor Sendhil Mullainathan, which argues that while police killings are a race problem, they are a problem that is not necessarily rooted in racial bias on the part of individual officers.

During his discussion, Clarke responded to Mullainathan’s claim that low-income African Americans are overrepresented in the population of drug dealers due to fewer job options by alleging that the real reason black people are more likely to have interactions with law enforcement is because of “dysfunctional black subculture.”

Clarke continued, “Let me tell you why blacks sell drugs and involve themselves in criminal behavior, instead of a more socially acceptable lifestyle: because they’re uneducated, they’re lazy, and they’re morally bankrupt. That’s why.”

A few days later, Sheriff Clarke took to Twitter to share his thoughts on Black Lives Matter:

What Could We Expect From A GOP Debate Organized By Glenn Beck?

A few weeks ago, Glenn Beck floated the idea of launching a temporary church for the express purpose of exploiting a Republican National Committee loophole that allows churches to host "discussion forums" with Republican presidential candidates since the RNC was refusing to allow his network to host any sort of official GOP debate. 

As Beck made clear at the time, he didn't want to invite Mike Huckabee, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, Donald Trump or any of the other candidates whom he dismisses as "progressives" to participate in his debate because he despises them and has repeatedly and openly attacked them on air. In fact, Beck despises the Republican Party as a whole and has, for years, been urging his audience to "defund the GOP" and refuse to give the party even one dime of support in an effort to break its back and destroy it.

Now, in the wake of the RNC's decision to cancel an upcoming debate that was to be hosted by NBC after its candidates performed miserably at a CNBC debate last month, Beck is demonstrating his trademark consistency and integrity by sending a letter to the RNC begging to be allowed to host this debate on his own network instead:

We’d like to make our audience your audience, by hosting the ninth scheduled debate on February 26th. We are prepared to produce a new kind of debate, in both substance and distribution. In fact, this will be the first truly cross-platform, digitally engaged debate in the history of American politics, and one that we are confident will reach one of the largest blocks of conservative voters in history.


By selecting TheBlaze TV to produce this debate, you honor and recognize the value of a critical voting bloc. And you need to know that we are committed to a fair and honorable production that will make every candidate, the party and our voters proud. But most important, at the end of our debate, voters will know not just where our candidates stand, but why, and how they intend to accomplish their goals. 

We both know that the time for theatrics and hyperbole is over. These are serious days full of both promise and peril. My audience and I urge the Republican National Committee to make the February 26th debate meaningful, thoughtful, and responsive to the issues of not just conservative America, but to all Americans. Placing this debate on TheBlaze TV will fulfill that promise.

Aside from the insanity of allowing an avowed enemy of the GOP and a significant number of the current Republican candidates to host an official Republican debate, we cannot even begin to imagine what a debate hosted by a unhinged conspiracy theorist like Beck would even look like.

Would candidates be asked what they would do to stop that sociopath and dictator President Obama from fomenting revolution in order to round up conservatives and stick them in internment camps? Or about Beck's concerns that Obama is trying to start a race-based civil war and has been seeking to confiscate weapons in order to re-impose slavery and eventually start killing American citizens?

Would they be asked to go on record vowing to stop revolutionaries from pulling people from their cars and executing them in the streets and from secretly murdering Beck himself in the middle of the night?

Will they be expected to comment on Beck's belief that this nation is "the stink on the crap pile" and that it is has now become a badge of "eternal dishonor" to be an American because our society has gone completely insane and become a danger to the entire world?

Would they have to weigh in on his theory that the missing Malaysian airplane had been hijacked for use in a terrorist attack against America, his warning that immigrants crossing the southern border would lead to an Israeli/Palestinian-type of conflict in the U.S, or his conviction that a measles outbreak was nothing but a "hoax" designed to increase government control?

Would they be asked if they share Beck's conviction that Common Core is the "biggest story in American history" because it is an evil plot to turn school children into cogs living under a police state?

Will they be asked what they think about the Associated Press having raped Bill Cosby, or about how the Ebola outbreak caused race riots all over the nation, or how the government engaged in a massive cover-up of the truth about the Boston Marathon bombing?

On the other hand, can the RNC risk stiffing Beck when he is a prophet who has been sent by God, especially at a time when America has become engaged in full-fledged demon worship and our days are numbered because society has gone insane and been engulfed in darkness?

In retrospect, perhaps a GOP debate led by Beck is exactly what this nation needs, given that his audience, after all, is the modern day civil rights movement and consists of the very people forseen by God and the Founding Fathers who would one day rise up and save this nation.

Share this page: Facebook Twitter Digg SU Digg Delicious